Mediation Intelligence Brief: Closed Florida Medical-Malpractice Suits
A written, source-checked comparison of Florida medical-malpractice suits, prepared to answer a single factual question posed by counsel.
Each suit is identified by court case number, read from the complaint and docket, and matched to its record in the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation closed-claim database.1 Every figure is cited to its record. A match that cannot be confirmed by case number is labeled probable and is not counted.
At a glance
- Product
- Mediation Intelligence Brief
- Price
- Quoted before work begins
- Format
- Written report, PDF
- Delivery
- Agreed before work begins
- Scope
- Florida circuit-court suits
- Sources
- Court file; OIR closed-claim data
Sample brief
Three Brevard County cases in which a spinal epidural abscess was missed in the emergency department. Built from the court complaints and the payments insurers reported to the State, with case summaries, payment records, selection method and sources.
View sample brief Sample S-002
Questions a brief can answer, for example:
- When a physician and the physician's practice were sued together, did the practice pay separately, through which insurer, and at what stage?
- In suits over a given procedure, how long did they run from filing to closing?
- What defense and claim-handling cost did insurers report?
Example
Short answer. The employer paid separately in three of five suits (A, C and E). In A the hospital, self-insured, paid $450,000, more than the physician’s $300,000. In C the practice and physician shared a carrier; in E the practice paid through a different one. In B and D no closed-claim record exists for the employer. Totals ran from $0 to $750,000.
| Case | Alleged error and injury | Reported payments, by insured | Time to resolution |
|---|---|---|---|
| AExample Miami v. Example HospitalMiami-Dade CountySued physician; hospital as employer (vicarious) | Abnormal chest imaging not followed up for 14 monthsInjury Lung cancer found at stage IV; death | Physician · Insurer 1$300,000 Hospital · self-insured$450,000 Total reported$750,000 | 4.2 yearsinjury to close |
| BExample Brevard v. Example HospitalBrevard CountySued physician; hospital as employer (vicarious) | Abnormal mammogram result not communicated for 11 monthsInjury Stage III breast cancer; mastectomy and chemotherapy | Physician · Insurer 2$425,000 Hospital · no record— Total reported$425,000 | 3.6 yearsinjury to close |
| CExample Seminole v. Example Private PracticeSeminole CountySued physician; practice P.A. (vicarious) | Positive stool test not acted on for two yearsInjury Colorectal cancer found at stage IV | Physician · Insurer 3$350,000 Practice · Insurer 3$200,000 Total reported$550,000 | 4.9 yearsinjury to close |
| DExample Hillsborough v. Example Private PracticeHillsborough CountySued physician; practice LLC (vicarious) | Skin-biopsy result not reviewed for nine monthsInjury Melanoma found after spread to lymph nodes | Physician · Insurer 4$0 Practice · no record— Total reported$0 | 2.9 yearsinjury to close |
| Probable match by name and injury date: one further $300,000 record that may belong to the practice in Case D. Shown for reference; excluded from all counts and totals. | |||
| EExample Duval v. Example Private PracticeDuval CountySued physician; practice (direct and vicarious) | Radiology recommendation for follow-up CT not relayed to the patientInjury Lung cancer found at stage III; lobectomy | Physician · Insurer 2$600,000 Practice · Insurer 5$150,000 Total reported$750,000 | 5.3 yearsinjury to close |
| Coverage: 5 suits compared · 8 verified closed-claim records · 7 with payment | |||
Fields and their sources
| Field | Source |
|---|---|
| Court, case number, filing date | Court docket |
| Defendants, as named in the complaint | Complaint |
| Insured party and insurer | Closed-claim record |
| Amount paid, and each defendant's share | Closed-claim record |
| Defense and claim-handling expense | Closed-claim record |
| Time from injury to resolution | Closed-claim record |
| Match basis (case number or probable) | Impleader, stated for each suit |
Method
- Counsel describes the matter briefly, using the request form or by email, and the question, scope and price are agreed before work begins.
- Comparable suits are selected and read against the docket.
- Each suit is matched to a closed-claim record by court case number.
- The brief reports what the records show and where they are incomplete.
Glossary
- Suit
- A lawsuit, identified by its court case number.
- Closed-claim record
- An entry in the Office of Insurance Regulation closed-claim database. One suit may have several, one per insured defendant.
- Verified
- A suit matched to a closed-claim record by court case number.
- Probable
- A possible match on name and date alone. Shown in the brief, never counted.
- Defense and claim-handling cost
- The insurer's reported expense for handling the claim, apart from the amount paid to the claimant.
Limitations
Ordering
Use the request form, or write to orders@medmalscout.com. We prepare a brief on each suit for one customer only, checked against past orders before we accept it.
Questions
Does the brief tell me what my case is worth?
No. It reports what comparable suits show. It does not suggest a value.
Can I ask about a particular physician?
No. Briefs are organized by case, not by provider.
Where do the records come from?
Public court dockets and complaints, and the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation's public closed-claim data.
Will the other side get the same brief?
No. We prepare a brief on each suit for one customer only, and orders are checked against past orders before we accept them.
Are case-specific briefs available to mediators?
No. Briefs are prepared for counsel in a case.
Notes
- Closed-claim records are reported by insurers to the Florida Office of Insurance Regulation. Impleader reports them as filed.
- Where a detail is not in the record, the brief says so rather than estimating it.